In its Final Written Decision, the Board found that Petitioner had shown by a preponderance of the evidence that claim 17 is unpatentable but that Petitioner did not prove that claim 26 is unpatentable. The Board also denied-in-part and dismissed-in-part the parties’ Motions to Exclude Evidence. Continue reading
Category Archives: Translation
Granting Motions to Submit Corrected Translations IPR2014-01555, 01556, 01558
In its Decision, the Board granted Petitioner’s motions to accept verified translations, which were opposed by Patent Owner. Continue reading
Denying Rehearing IPR2014-01121, 01122, 01123
IPR2014-01121, 01122, 01123
In its Decision, the Board denied Petitioner’s request for rehearing of its decision denying institution of the 01123 IPR and denying certain grounds in both the 01121 and 01122 IPRs. In particular, Petitioners sought rehearing of the Board’s determination that Petitioner relied upon a reference that was defective under 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(b) – a Japanese reference filed with an English translation but without an attesting affidavit as required by the rule. Continue reading
Order Regarding Translator Declarations CBM2014-00131, CBM2014-00137
In its Order, the Board resolved a dispute between the parties concerning whether Patent Owner is permitted to depose individuals who translated one of the references that forms the basis for the Board’s institution of review. In particular, the Board ordered Petitioner to file the declarations of individuals who translated portions of the prior art reference, ordered that Patent Owner is authorized to cross examine the individuals who translated the reference, and denied Petitioner’s request to file a motion for additional discovery. Continue reading
Granting and Denying Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2014-00283
In its Decision, the Board granted-in-part Petitioner’s Motion to Submit Supplemental Information. As a preliminary matter, the Board noted that Patent Owner filed an opposition and Petitioner filed a reply to the opposition without authorization by the Board. Although the Board considered the unauthorized papers in this case, it explained that parties must seek authorization to file a responsive paper when the motion requires authorization. Continue reading
Granting Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2013-00540, 541, 544
In its Decision, the Board granted Petitioner’s motion to submit supplemental information. The Board also allowed the parties additional briefing based on the supplemental information and reset Due Date 7 (Oral Hearing) to accommodate consideration of the supplemental information. Continue reading
Final Written Decision IPR2013-00218
In its Final Written Decision, the Board found that Petitioner had proven by a preponderance of the evidence that claims 1-5, 22, and 34 of the ’003 patent are unpatentable. The ’003 patent generally “describes generating and displaying stereoscopic panoramic images by using a rotating camera.” Continue reading